Do you know this feeling? The campaign is running, the dashboards are glowing green, the click numbers are rising – and yet there’s still that uneasy sense that impact is getting lost somewhere. Welcome to digital marketing in 2026, where data is abundant, but real insights often remain scarce.
In our webinar "Lost in Clicks: Measuring impact instead of polishing numbers", I got to the bottom of this drama that plays out in marketing departments every day. Imagine your campaign as a red thread stretching from the initial objective all the way to measurable impact. At four critical points, this thread can break – and that’s exactly where you lose control over your marketing success.
So you don’t miss a single scene of this drama, you can watch the original webinar recording here (available in German). For those who prefer reading or want to move straight into execution: At the end of this article, you’ll find our handout with all action plans available for download, as well as a detailed Q&A where we answered the most pressing questions from webinar participants.
“If the campaign’s goal isn’t to generate as many visits as possible, why are we discussing poor click-to-visit rate with the client?”
This quote from a real client relationship illustrates a fundamental problem: the discrepancy between agreed objectives and the metrics ultimately used to evaluate a campaign.
Wrong or unclear goals are not just a communication problem. They typically arise from:
The solution lies in a clear hierarchy of success measurement:
Each level must contribute to the one above it. This sounds obvious, but in practice it often fails due to inconsistent communication between stakeholders or shifting priorities during active campaigns.
An example: A company defines its business goal as “increase top-of-mind awareness”, but selects “maximise conversions” as the campaign goal. Both are legitimate goals – but they require completely different strategies, channels, and measurement approaches. Without clear prioritisation, every evaluation becomes a balancing act, as different stakeholders assess the campaign against different standards.
At Webrepublic, we work with a matrix of success metrics covering multiple levels: from operational metrics such as CPM and click-through rate, to tactical KPIs such as reach and engagement, and strategic metrics such as ad recall and new customers. The key is that for each metric, it is clearly defined who uses it, for what purpose, and which source serves as the single source of truth.
Your Action Plan:
“We’re seeing a relatively large discrepancy between clicks in Google Ads (Demand Gen) and the actual visits measured in our web analytics.”
This statement highlights a common problem: there is often a gap between clicks and actual impact.
It becomes especially problematic when unbalanced platform data distorts the overall picture. A real example from my analysis: Google Ads delivered 27% engaged sessions, LinkedIn Ads 22%, Campaign Manager Ads 15%, TikTok Ads 1%, and Facebook Ads also 1%. What does that tell us? Initially, nothing about the absolute quality of the individual channels. Instead, it shows that the alignment between platform, audience, message, and campaign objective varies significantly.
What becomes clear is this: upper-funnel and lower-funnel activities differ fundamentally:
The customer journey is rarely linear. In the so-called “Messy Middle,” people move back and forth between researching and evaluating options before making a decision. Both funnel stages are important – but they require different expectations and measurement approaches.
Misaligned campaign impact typically results from:
Your Action Plan:
“We’ve identified a major discrepancy in our data. Search Console shows 425,000 clicks last week. The Webrepublic dashboard shows 308,000 for the same period.”
Discrepancies like this are not just frustrating – they are symptoms of deeper problems in the measurement infrastructure.
Invisible success typically results from three factors:
The complexity of modern measurement setups is systematically underestimated. A state-of-the-art setup connects multiple components: cross-device tracking, tag management systems, API gateways, data streams, data lakes, and visualisation tools. Something can go wrong at every interface.
The gold standard today is a setup using a first-party domain with server-side tagging. This means tracking scripts are not executed directly in users’ browsers. Instead, data is first sent to a server on your own domain and then forwarded to analytics and advertising platforms.
The advantages:
Successful measurement relies on three pillars:
Your Action Plan:
Ad fraud is a global problem of alarming scale – and it affects every campaign, including yours:
Fraudsters are becoming increasingly sophisticated. “Vapor,” one of the largest discovered ad fraud networks, consisted of over 300 malicious apps with 60 million downloads before being removed.
Fraud distorts campaign performance at multiple levels: Impressions on fraudulent inventory mean your ads are being served on fake websites. Automated clicks simulate interest that never existed. And a high proportion of bots among your website visitors distorts all your analyses – from bounce rate and conversion rate to A/B tests.
Not all bots are malicious. Many e-commerce sites see 60–80% bot traffic, most of which comes from legitimate sources such as search engines or monitoring services. The challenge is distinguishing between good bots, bad bots, and real users.
Here’s a controversial thought: the optimal fraud rate is greater than 0%. Why? Because fighting fraud consumes resources. Additional security measures slow down ad delivery, increase costs, and may limit reach. Beyond a certain point, the effort outweighs the benefit. The key is finding the right balance.
Server log analysis plays an important role here. Logfiles show exactly which user agents access your site, when, and how. Integrated marketing means connecting different data sources intelligently.
Your Action Plan:
Your campaign’s red thread remains intact only when all four areas are under control: Clear goals and KPIs create orientation. Precise targeting and messaging connect audience and message. Reliable measurement setups make success visible. Transparent data quality protects budgets and builds trust.
To ensure your red thread doesn’t break, download the webinar handout with all checklists and action plans as a PDF here.
The good news: You don’t need to perfect everything at once. Start with an honest assessment and focus on where your campaigns lose the most impact. Digital marketing today is no longer about more data, but better data. Not more clicks, but measurable impact. At Webrepublic, we see ourselves as your partner on this journey – from strategy to measurable impact.
“How do we handle clients who don’t yet have clear goals?”
We start with a structured top-down discovery process: Business objectives → Marketing contribution → Campaign objectives. The key is not to start with KPIs, but with the question: What should change in the business?
“How long does it take to implement a robust measurement setup?”
A basic implementation takes four to six weeks. A comprehensive setup with first-party data and integrations takes three to six months, depending on developer availability. Important: measurement setups require continuous maintenance.
“How do you balance data quality and consent rate?”
Transparency and communicating value are critical. Technically, we rely on granular consent management that differentiates between purposes.
“How often should KPIs be reviewed?”
We recommend an annual strategic review. During active campaigns, KPIs should remain stable.
Latest insights
